1:00:00Claude Design: Best AI Design Tool Ever?
Introduction to Claude Design The video is a live stream demo of Claude Design, an AI tool for design. The presenter aims to provide a real-time, authentic look at the tool, including its struggles and successes. Claude Design is positioned as a best-in-class tool for wireframes and visual designs, but not for videos. Getting Started with Claude Design Users can access Claude Design at claw.ai/design. Options include creating a new prototype, slide deck, or starting from a template (e.g., animation, design system). The presenter imports an app idea ("Senior Brains," a cognitive exercise app for seniors) from ideabrowser.com. The initial step is to create a wireframe to save tokens and define features. Wireframe Generation Process The tool prompts the user with detailed questions to gather context, similar to a product manager. Key questions include device type, desired screens (onboarding, home, rewards, progress), gamification elements, accessibility needs (large text, high contrast, voice narration), visual tone (low-fidelity recommended), and product name. The presenter is impressed by the quality and depth of the questionnaire. Claude Design generates three distinct wireframe directions (A: Warm and Friendly, B: Mascot Forward, C: Calendar Ritual First). The presenter notes the agency-like feel of providing multiple directions. A tip about a "napkin sketch tool" is mentioned but not immediately visible. Evaluating Wireframe Directions and Hi-Fi Designs Direction A (Warm Stack) features a card-based home, a small mascot, and feels familiar yet calm. Direction C (Calendar Habit First) is less gamey, focusing on a daily path. Direction B (Mascot Forward) uses the mascot as a navigator, providing encouragement and feedback. The audience votes for Direction A to proceed with. The presenter requests a hi-fi version, referencing Duolingo and Brain Rot app design languages. The tool encounters an error ("It broke"), highlighting the reality of live demos. After refreshing and retrying, the hi-fi designs are generated. The hi-fi designs for Direction A are presented, featuring onboarding, a daily home screen with social elements ("From your family"), session results, and progress tracking. The presenter adds a "Share to Facebook" button via freehand drawing/annotation, which is incorporated with good copy ("Share this win on Facebook"). The presenter is impressed with the visual designs, exceeding expectations. Creating a Pitch Deck While waiting for designs to render, the presenter initiates a separate task to create a VC-style pitch deck for "Senior Brains." The prompts include target funding ($2 million), target investors (Sequoia Capital), pitch length (5 minutes), team info, and aesthetic preferences. The resulting deck is described as "unbelievable" and potentially the best LLM-generated deck seen, covering market opportunity, problem/solution, competition, product features, science backing, go-to-market strategy (adult child buyer), and financial projections. A lesson learned: it appears difficult to run multiple tasks simultaneously; the tool may freeze or stop. Video Generation Attempt The presenter attempts to create a 30-second video ad for "Senior Brains." The prompt includes referencing existing project screenshots and requesting a cute, funny, warm, and interesting tone targeting the adult children of seniors. Challenges arise with context linking and the questionnaire disappearing. The generated video features a mother and daughter, with the daughter gifting the app. It is described as "better but sucks" and not a cinematic commercial. The presenter suggests Claude Design is not ideal for video generation, comparing it unfavorably to another tool (everense.ai). Final Impressions and Conclusion Claude Design excels at wireframing and generating pitch decks. The visual design capabilities are rated as "really really good." The tool struggles with simultaneous tasks and video generation (rated 5/10 at best). The presenter emphasizes the value of getting hands-on experience with the tool. Despite some bugs and limitations, Claude Design is deemed worth trying and will be used by the presenter, particularly for its wireframing capabilities. Token usage is a concern for some users, though the presenter on a Max plan did not immediately run out during the demo.















































